How safe is ceremonial monarchy?
By: Dovan Rai
November 20, 2006 | Join the discussion (5)
Times Viewed
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.everestuncensored.org/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/236Technorati Tags:
Add to Del.icio.us | Digg it | Add to Slashdot | Add to Y!
Comments
If this is what you have created, then you have really improved your design skill. As for the creativity I always believed in you. Good work Dovan!!
By: Nilesh Shrestha | November 20, 2006 07:55 PM
Very creative and well illustrated!
How safe is ceromonial morrnarchy is the question.
Does Nepal really need it? If yes why and if not why? We can have debate on this and my point of view is - If the mornachy is for identity of being a hindu kingdom versus just any other county then maybe otherwise lets be a small hindu democratic country or just a small progressive democratic country. Nepal can do without the ceromonical mornarchy and which means it is not safe at all.
What has the mornarchy and in this case King Gyanendra contributed to the country? No King or King, it is the people themself that has to take the coutnry to the next level so why even have a ceromonial mornachy? So the ceromonial mornachy is NOT safe.
By: Mamta Sharma | November 21, 2006 04:12 PM
dovan,
this is really really really good job of you
By: Dovan Lover | June 28, 2007 01:38 PM
superb work dovan!!!!!!!! U portrayed the picture perfectly...
By: Nischal | June 30, 2007 11:52 PM
During these Capitalism days, no cermemony of any form , either King or whatever should exist. Really nice picturesque where mice are helping the Demon tiger to rise. Congrats that it has been viewed 1287 times. Even Nilesh appreciated your good job and Dovan lover has emerged out of nowhere. There are 1000s of follwers dovan, give them something again like in nov. 20, 2006.
By: noCeremony | July 1, 2007 12:03 AM