Home About UsContact Us
Spring is here!!!
Archive :

Regd. Bloggers
(43)
(38)
(32)
(30)
(29)
(24)
(22)
(17)
(15)
(13)
(13)
(12)
(8)
(7)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
()
()
()
()
()
Be a Blogger
« Radical - To be or not to be | Main | तिम्रो सानो प्रयासको छोटो जमर्को »

How safe is ceremonial monarchy?


By: Dovan Rai

November 20, 2006 | Join the discussion (2)   Times Viewed

gyanendra.jpg




TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.everestuncensored.org/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/236

Technorati Tags:

Add to Del.icio.us | Digg it | Add to Slashdot | Add to Y!

Comments

If this is what you have created, then you have really improved your design skill. As for the creativity I always believed in you. Good work Dovan!!

By: Nilesh Shrestha | November 20, 2006 07:55 PM

Very creative and well illustrated!
How safe is ceromonial morrnarchy is the question.
Does Nepal really need it? If yes why and if not why? We can have debate on this and my point of view is - If the mornachy is for identity of being a hindu kingdom versus just any other county then maybe otherwise lets be a small hindu democratic country or just a small progressive democratic country. Nepal can do without the ceromonical mornarchy and which means it is not safe at all.

What has the mornarchy and in this case King Gyanendra contributed to the country? No King or King, it is the people themself that has to take the coutnry to the next level so why even have a ceromonial mornachy? So the ceromonial mornachy is NOT safe.

By: Mamta Sharma | November 21, 2006 04:12 PM

Post a comment






gallery.jpg
Recent Comments

Recent Posts
This page has been visited free hit counter times since 5th September 2006.